Application of Process Logic

Occam’s Razor: The simplest theory supported by the facts is usually the best

Fact: Rudy Guede was seen and reported to police on three separate break-ins in the weeks prior to the murder. Witness said he threatened them with a large knife on two occasions.

Fact: Rudy Guede’s DNA was found in the victim, on her, his fingerprints all over the room as well as saliva. No such evidence of Knox was found in the bedroom. Of Sollecito, all that was found was a small DNA sample on a bra clasp left on the scene for 47 days after the murder. DNA of three other unidentified individuals were also on the bra clasp. A bloody foot print under the body reported in the press as Knox’s was at trial identified as Guede’s.

Fact: No viable connection between Guede and Knox and Sollecito was ever established or even a viable motive for the crime.

Based on FACTS which theory does the evidence support? That Rudy Guede, a known burglar, aware of the residence through downstairs contacts broke into the house assaulted and killed Meredith Kercher,

Or

Three relative strangers, two with no criminal behavior whatsoever became involved in a drug fueled sex game (or whatever) that resulted in the death of Meredith Kercher.

- 1 in 3 convictions in Italy are overturned on appeal. A recent poll by Euromedia Research revealed that only 16% of Italians trust the judicial process in their country.

- The prosecutor, Giuliano Mignini, is himself undergoing prosecution for misconduct in the “Monster of Florence” case and facing 10 months in jail.

Neither facts nor logic support this conviction, and there is plenty of reasons to doubt the credibility of the judicial process in this case and the officials who administered it.